Questions to ponder after last night's debate: When was the last time I changed someone’s mind? Persuaded a person with diametrically opposed views to see things my way? Convinced someone to abandon their core beliefs?
I mention these questions because here we go again. Another presidential
debate. Instead of an evening of civil discourse, we, the American people (and the
rest of the world), had front row seats to two individuals exchanging insults, lies,
vitriol, accusations, and personal attacks, all of which will fuel further
division.
And the debating continued long after the candidates
walk off the stage.
In today’s world of Facebook, Instagram and Twitter,
everyone has a voice. With posts, tweets and blogs, people are vying to be
heard. With news broadcasts, radio programs, talk shows and podcasts, the
entire country is talking. Everyone wants to offer their opinions, confer their
beliefs, and promote their political agenda. And by golly, everyone better
listen.
But what happens when what we are saying is not getting
through? When our words scatter in the wind like confetti?
The talking gets louder. And faster. It becomes accusatory, dismissive,
and very, very judgmental. The talking resorts to name-calling and labeling
people as Democrat or Republican, Christian or non-Christian, middle class or
poor, educated or uneducated. We reduce the entire essence of a person or group
into one tiny label until that label is all we see anymore.
One cannot change someone’s mind by yelling at them,
pointing a finger, or calling them names; one cannot solidify their position by
toppling statues or breaking windows; it is impossible show someone the way
when they have been shoved to the ground.
Civil discourse is a lost art, mainly because listening is a
lost art. Once upon a time people listened with the intent to understand; but
today people listen only to hear themselves speak.
So, after we witnessed yet another poor example of politics
in America, ponder these questions instead: When was the last time I listened? Responded
to what a person said rather than focus only on what I wanted to say? Explained
my position without trying to push an agenda?
Conversed, rather than pontificate?
It is not an easy thing to do. Passion fuels our political ideals, but when we can acknowledge that passion and hate bubble forth from the same wellspring … well, maybe we should calm our bad selves down.
"I love argument, I love debate. I don't expect anyone just to sit there and agree with me."
-Margaret Thatcher
