Setting the (Nativity) Scene
This year, the Nativity scene in St. Peter’s Square is
causing quite a stir.
And not in a good way.
Take a look …
Nativities from Yesteryear
It may be hard to imagine, but St. Peter’s Square did not
have a Christmas tree or Nativity scene until 1982 when Pope John Paul II asked
the Vatican Governor’s Office to put some decorations in the square under his
office. With that simple request a tradition was born.
For 30 years the same traditional Nativity figures were used,
although new background scenes were commissioned each Christmas. Then, in 2011,
Pope Benedict approved the idea of each year having a Nativity donated from
different regions of Italy, with the first one set up a year later. Ever since,
the unveiling of the Christmas nativity in St. Peter’s Square is a much-anticipated
event.
Over the years there have been traditional Nativity scenes, many
of them reflecting both the region from which they hail and a significant event
that happened during the year. For example, the 2016 Nativity from Malta featured
damaged buildings and rubble to reflect the recent earthquake that struck
Amatrice and Norcia. The scene also featured a cross on its side as a tribute
to the many churches that were lost or damaged in the earthquake, as well as a
Maltese fishing boat to reflect the refugee crisis.
There have also been some controversial Nativity scenes,
such as the “Nativity of Mercy” donated by Naples in 2017. The scene, featuring
the Corporal Works of Mercy, caused an outcry because it featured a semi-nude
man (clothe the naked) and a dead arm hanging off a stretcher (bury the dead).
Delving Deeper
And then there is the 2020 Nativity.
It seems the immediate reaction is to comment on what it is not:
It is not tender, warm, or nostalgic! It does not reflect the beauty of the
Nativity story! It is not traditional!
The next reaction is to comment on what one sees: The
toy-like faces! The astronaut! The spark plug angel! The Darth Vader-like figure!
But as with anything in art (and faith), it helps to delve deeper into
the emotion, to go beyond what one sees, and to understand the background.
This year’s Nativity is a small part of a 54-piece set that
was originally made by art students between 1965-1975 in the town of Castelli
in the Abruzzo region of Italy. The town has a ceramic history that dates back to the 17th century, so the human figures in the Nativity scene
are made of stacked ceramic rings resulting in figures that are cylindrical
rather than curvy (like the natural human form).
The curved neon light is the Gran Sasso mountain, a symbol
of Abruzzo and where Pope John Paul II used to go skiing.
The colors used in the figures are the traditional colors of Castelli
ceramics.
To reflect the idea that Christ is born for everyone,
contemporary figures were added. The astronaut was created after the moon
landing in 1969 and he is offering the moon to Jesus as an expression of
worship.
The helmeted soldier figure represents a great sinner, which makes the comparison to Darth Vader (a fallen Jedi) especially interersting.
Yay or Nay?
What do I think? Honestly, I do not hate it. I appreciate
the context from which it was created, and while the figures would not be
considered aesthetically pleasing, in their own way they are beautiful.
And in a year when NOTHING has been conventional, maybe it
is fitting to have a non-conventional nativity.
On the other hand, I understand the harsh criticism, and
maybe this was not the right year and St. Peter’s Square was not the right
place. During a time when we are longing for normalcy, when many are looking to
the church for comfort, maybe a traditional nativity would have been a better
choice.
What do you think?
[photo credits: National Catholic Register, Catholic News Service]