I emerged from the movie theater this past Friday night thinking that Dunkirk was a really good movie. But once I returned home and did some research on both the movie and the history of Dunkirk, I realized it wasn't a good movie. It was a great movie. Sometimes, it's good to know something about a movie before you go see it.
So allow me . . .
1- Basic history of Dunkirk: In late May and early June of 1940, the advancing German army pushed back the British and French armies to the beaches at Dunkirk, France. Over 330,000 soldiers were trapped and needed to be evacuated, but since there were not enough ships to transport such large numbers the British Admiralty called on all British citizens in possession of sea-worthy boats to help in the effort. The campaign became known as the "Miracle of Dunkirk."
2- The story is told from three perspectives: land (over a period of one week), sea (a period of one day), air (a period of one hour). The timeline hops back and forth between the three perspectives, often overlapping, but eventually merge to a single moment in time.
3- A mole is a massive structure, usually constructed of stone, between places separated by water. In the movie, two concrete moles protect the outer harbor at Dunkirk. Because troops could not be evacuated from the beach shore, the moles were used as piers so the soldiers could board the ships despite the fact that the moles were not designed as docks.
[Disclosure: I mention this only because of my initial confusion. Since this was a war movie, I mistakenly assumed "mole" referred to a spy; as a result, I spent a few confusing minutes thinking that two characters were spies. Not so. Avoid my confusion.]
4- There is very little dialogue in the movie. This was done with intention by Christopher Nolan, the film's director. You are not meant to know the characters' stories -- where they are from, who they are, or their history -- as they aren't important; rather, you are meant to be with the characters in the moment as they struggle to survive.
5- The musical score is a dialogue in itself. It pounds, surges, and screams. You can even hear the underlying ticking of a clock as momentum builds. It is a powerful element to the movie.
6- After the evacuation, Winston Churchill gave his famous "We Shall Fight on the Beaches" speech to the House of Commons which left no doubt as to Britain's resolve to continue the fight on all fronts.
"We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender ... our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old." ~Winston Churchill
And now, my friends, you know. Go see the movie.
Showing posts with label movie reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movie reviews. Show all posts
Sunday, August 6, 2017
Thursday, June 9, 2016
Me Before You: Book vs. Movie
The book vs. the movie
Amazingly,
the movie stayed (mostly) true to the book. Events unfold just as they do in
the book and the same conversations take place. There were some things left out
– Mr. Traynor’s infidelity, the estrangement of Will’s parents, the side story
of Lou’s sister – and while those omission didn’t affect the flow of the story
I was disappointed that they left out the entire episode of Lou getting lost in
the maze. For me, that was a big moment in the book when Will, despite being confined
to a wheelchair, becomes the hero when he rescues her, comforts her, and helps
her to face her demons.
The characters
They
could not have found a more perfect actress to play Lou. She was cute, funny,
self-effacing, brave, loving – basically everything you imagined her to be. Really,
all the characters were spot on. I especially loved Lou’s boyfriend (also known
as Running Man) who, in his all self-centeredness, was oddly endearing. And if you think he reminds you of Neville
Longbottom from the Harry Potter series, why, you would be correct. He’s all
grown up, now. And funny.
Did you notice …
I’ve
read the book three times. I’ve seen the movie. Here are a few interesting
interpretations, insights, symbolisms, and ironies I noticed:
-Lou is
caring for a man who cannot walk while dating someone who is training for a
triathlon.
-It’s
interesting that the author chose the name Will who, in the end, no longer has
the will to live.
-The
title, Me Before You, can be interpreted a variety of ways: Will before meeting
Lou or, conversely, Lou before meeting Will – or more simply, who I was before
I met you. But critics of the book have pointed out that the title can also be
viewed as me before you (a selfish attitude) as opposed to you before me (a
sacrifice).
-In the
book, Lou’s mother is one of the most vocal against Will’s decision. Her
viewpoint is strongly maternal, and in the movie it is not a coincidence that
she is wearing a gold cross necklace.
Dignitas
When I
first read the book I had never heard of Dignitas and so I googled it, thinking
that the author, Jojo Moyes, had made it up. She didn’t. The Dignitas motto, To live with dignity – to die with dignity,
highlights the association’s goal of providing counseling with regard to all
end of life issues including accompaniment
of dying patients and assistance with a self-determined end of life. In
other words, assisted suicide.
As I
browsed the website, everything that is Catholic within me was horrified. I
know that over the years there have been countless stories of people choosing
to end their life rather than be faced with a debilitating illness, such as
Brittany Maynard who ended her life rather than succumb to brain cancer. But
this … to make an appointment to die? To travel to Switzerland (where assisted
suicide is legal), check in, say goodbye to loved ones, and then … check out of
life? It just felt wrong on so many levels.
Dignitas in the movie
Now, I
will tell you that the movie glossed over the Dignitas angle; in fact, other
than a quick view of the name in a letterhead, it’s not really mentioned and
never is it fully explained. Honestly, if I hadn’t read the book I don’t think
I would have fully understood what Will was planning to do. Nor does the scene provide
any insight as to how Will actually dies. One minute Will is in bed saying
goodbye, and in the next scene he isn’t there.
There is
no doubt that the movie sugar-coats Will’s decision. Maybe the producers backed
off from an emotionally charged subject, or maybe they wanted to concentrate on
the romance part of the story. Either way, there is much more depth in the
book.
Yes, I know, they’re just
characters in a book and actors in a movie …
Oh, the
tears I shed (all three times I read the book). But for heaven’s sake! It’s a
book. With characters. It’s a movie. With actors. And yet, that is probably one
of the things that hit home for me because there I was, getting emotionally
entangled in the story, but somewhere out there in this big world this is someone’s
life. Somewhere out there someone isn’t reading a story … but living it.
What would
you do …
In high
school I had an English teacher who expected us to spend the first ten minutes
of class journaling on a topic she had written on the board. One day the topic
was this: “Do you think you have the capacity to kill?” I was emphatic with my
answer: No. Killing is wrong. We are made in the image of God and to take
another life is a sin. Mankind should strive for all that is good, pure, and
holy. We are meant to protect our fellow brothers and sisters. I wrote
furiously for ten minutes.
But afterwards
our teacher offered some what if
scenarios: What if you were in a kill or be killed situation? What if you were
in a kill or have a loved one be killed situation? She wasn’t being
dramatic (although now that I think
about it she had set up a classic Hunger Games scenario); she was teaching us
that we live in a world in which the lines between right and wrong are
sometimes obscured by more than a little gray; that we can vehemently declare
to know what we will do in a certain situation, but do we know? Really? How could we unless we are in the reality? And if we can’t truly know, how can we possible judge?
Why I loved the book (and liked
the movie) …
I read the book long before I knew they were making a
movie. The book does not glorify in any way the right to die issue, nor does it
insinuate in any way that anyone with a physical disability is less of a
person; if anything, it shows the incredible pain and devastation left behind
with an individual's decision to end his/her own life. I thought the book did
an excellent job of giving us a peek (and just a peek because we can never
really know) of the incredible physical and emotional pain that some people
face, and while I still emphatically disagreed with Will's decision (I was so
ANGRY with him), for the first time I could come from a place not of
understanding or acceptance, but of empathy and compassion.
Think
about this: Will had the money for around-the-clock care. He could travel. He
had excellent caretakers. He even got the girl. So why did he still want to
die? How could he do that? We don’t know because he was in a place we can never be.
Over the past few weeks I’ve seen countless articles
condemning the movie as “dangerous” because of how it ends; that it portrays
assisted suicide in such a manner that it might be construed as morally
acceptable; that “Louisa et al” should have helped Will sort through and address
his problems and the fact they stood by and let it happen makes them murderers
(although I honestly don’t know what else “Louisa et al” could have done). That’s
why the book was so thought-provoking … there wasn’t a single character who
knew what to do. And why should they? How can anyone be prepared for something
like that?
In the end, Will's decision to die reverberated through
the lives of everyone he knew, and anyone can see how most of it resulted in a
lot of pain. So although the book didn't end the way I would've wanted it to
end, there is a lesson in Will’s choice. Not answers, but lessons.

Friday, January 22, 2016
Just Give Them Wool Socks! (a girl's take on The Revenant)
This afternoon Joe and I went to see The Revenant. What did I think of it? you ask. Allow me ...
We went to the new movie theater -- the one with reclining seats -- which was ideal for a movie which lasted almost three hours. BUT, I couldn't help thinking that if my Dad ever went to that theater, he would be asleep within five minutes of reclining his chair.
The movie takes place during the wintertime of 1823, and all throughout the movie I was unsettled for this reason: everyone got wet and stayed wet the entire winter. Frontiersmen waded through rivers, jumped into waterfalls, floated downriver, and got lost in snowstorms. After getting wet they built a fire, but with all those layers (fur and animal hide) I just know they never had a time to dry off properly and therefore had wet feet all winter. This really, really bothered me. THEY NEEDED WOOL SOCKS (and to hang up their wet clothes overnight).
That grizzly bear scene ... I can't even.
There were a lot of themes going on, with Man vs. Nature being one of the main ones. But wait. Let me amend that ... wounded-forced-to-crawl-on-his-elbows-because-of-a-broken-leg Man vs. Nature. If you ask me, nature had an unfair advantage.
To survive in the wilderness during the winter, here's is what you need: a giant bear hide, a canteen, and gunpowder for the purpose of administering First Aid. A rifle would be nice, but it isn't strictly necessary.
Joe and I agreed that the movie reminded us of Castaway ... there were long periods where no one spoke. When you're trying to survive, the spoken word is irrelevant.
Frontiersman #1 to Frontiersman #2: You go that way, and I'll go this way. We'll meet back here in thirty minutes.
Me, thinking: Meet back where???? How do you know where you are to find your way back to the exact same spot in the forest? In the wintertime? With no sun to guide you? And why are you guys separating? Bad things happen when you separate.
I appreciate when directors take the time to tell a story, and this one unfolded beautifully. Despite the violence (man vs. nature, man vs. man) and the edge-of-your-seat intensity (man, I'm telling you, that grizzly bear scene just about did me in) it was a very good movie.
And now I am in serious need of a chick flick. A little less raw meat and a little more tea in the drawing room, if you please. Maybe Jane Eyre, or Pride & Prejudice.
But first let me go put on some wool socks and get Joe (my personal frontiersman) to build a fire in the fireplace.
1-
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7-
Me, thinking: Meet back where???? How do you know where you are to find your way back to the exact same spot in the forest? In the wintertime? With no sun to guide you? And why are you guys separating? Bad things happen when you separate.
8-
I appreciate when directors take the time to tell a story, and this one unfolded beautifully. Despite the violence (man vs. nature, man vs. man) and the edge-of-your-seat intensity (man, I'm telling you, that grizzly bear scene just about did me in) it was a very good movie.
9-
And now I am in serious need of a chick flick. A little less raw meat and a little more tea in the drawing room, if you please. Maybe Jane Eyre, or Pride & Prejudice.
10-
But first let me go put on some wool socks and get Joe (my personal frontiersman) to build a fire in the fireplace.

Tuesday, June 5, 2012
In Which I Get Mad at Thomas Hardy
Recently I was in the mood for a good BBC drama, so I checked out the DVD series Tess of the D'Urbervilles. Having read Thomas Hardy in college, I was familiar with the story and knew it would contain plenty of drama, angst, and human nature to feed my mood.
And so it was. This version was so excellent and compelling that I was drawn into the story. Then, at the very moment Angel leaves Tess, I suddenly realize that I couldn't remember how the novel ended. I remember everything that happens in the rest of the story, but just not the ending.
Why? How could I not remember the ending? I mean, I wrote a paper on it, for goodness sakes! I thought and thought. What happened in the novel? Surely Angel returns. Does he fight for Tess' honor? Does Tess get revenge on the unctuous Alec D'Urbervill? Does Angel forgive Tess?
Unfortunately, I know Thomas Hardy, and his novels aren't ... happy. Chances are this was going to end very badly, and I just couldn't stand it. I turned off the DVD.
Then I got mad. Would it have hurt the man (Thomas Hardy, that is) to have written one happy ending? Would it have killed him to allow Tess to finally find happiness? I fretted, and fumed, and worried.
That evening I returned to my movie and, sure enough, a tragic ending. But, oh, the story was so good that I watched it again, sad ending and all.
Dear Mr. Hardy,
My apologies.
It would appear you knew what you were doing, after all.
And so it was. This version was so excellent and compelling that I was drawn into the story. Then, at the very moment Angel leaves Tess, I suddenly realize that I couldn't remember how the novel ended. I remember everything that happens in the rest of the story, but just not the ending.
Why? How could I not remember the ending? I mean, I wrote a paper on it, for goodness sakes! I thought and thought. What happened in the novel? Surely Angel returns. Does he fight for Tess' honor? Does Tess get revenge on the unctuous Alec D'Urbervill? Does Angel forgive Tess?
Unfortunately, I know Thomas Hardy, and his novels aren't ... happy. Chances are this was going to end very badly, and I just couldn't stand it. I turned off the DVD.
Then I got mad. Would it have hurt the man (Thomas Hardy, that is) to have written one happy ending? Would it have killed him to allow Tess to finally find happiness? I fretted, and fumed, and worried.
That evening I returned to my movie and, sure enough, a tragic ending. But, oh, the story was so good that I watched it again, sad ending and all.
Dear Mr. Hardy,
My apologies.
It would appear you knew what you were doing, after all.
![]() |
![]() |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




