-1-
The New York Times and other news
agencies have applauded your Super Bowl halftime show as being about woman
empowerment. You stated how you wanted to give the message that women are on
top of the world. There is no doubt that you are successful, beautiful, and
talented. There is no doubt you are a powerful woman. There is no doubt that
you can command audiences. But an editorial in the Washington Times also called
your show “scandalously sexual” so I’m curious as to why you chose to objectify
women in a manner we’ve been fighting against for years?
-2-
According to a report by the Miami-Dade
State Attorney’s Office, Florida ranks third nationwide in human trafficking
cases and Miami-Dade County is the biggest sex trafficking hub in the state. Then,
when you add a sporting event like the Super Bowl to the mix, the number of sex
trafficking cases skyrockets. Did you think about this? Were you thinking about woman empowerment as you selected costumes, choreographed dance moves,
and strategically catered to camera angles?
-3-
Supporters of your show have
mentioned that it was also meant to be an in-your-face commentary to Oscar
voters for their mistake in not nominating you in last year’s stripper drama,
Hustlers. I find this interesting since words like “stripper” and “stripper’s
pole” have been used to describe the halftime performance. Again, how does this
not objectify women?
-4-
I understand that the use of rope
and girls in cages were meant to convey that women can break free; that it was
a political statement against immigration policy when you said, “Other people
can try to build walls, keep us out or put is in cages.” But break free to do
what? Undulate, twerk, spread their legs, grab their crotch, and put their
bodies in a situation of being objectified? Forgive me, but surely you can
understand the confusion.
-5-
How did you honestly think your
performance would be viewed? For example, did
bar patrons, college students, or football fans across America watch the show
and say, “Wow, what a powerful, strong woman.”? Or, were the majority saying, “Damn, she’s hot.”?
Was your intention to get attention for your accomplishments, talents and strengths, or to
showcase something else entirely?
-6-
Finally, as a powerful woman in which you called the shots, and being in a position in which you could
have taken the show in any direction artistically, why then did you choose to go back to
objectifying women in this manner when we have been making strives to overcome this objectification? Would you consider this
progress, or regression?

3 comments:
Amen! That's all I say!! You said it all very well! Jill
These are amazing questions! I wish someone was bold enough to do an interview with them to ask all this and see what they say on national tv.
Thanks, Jill.
And Pegasus ... that would be amazing if someone would be bold enough. Then again, put me at a lunch table with either and I just might have a go at it!
Post a Comment